Coach your employees for too long, and you might start missing productivity goals. Jump to a Performance Improvement Plan too soon, and you risk discouraging your employees. What's the right mix of encouragement and performance improvements?
If you’re a manager — even a very task-focused one — you need to be thinking in part about employee development. How can you make your best employees even better (and advance their careers in the process), and how you can take your worst-performing employees and either help them succeed or find them a way out of your organization?
There are a few different approaches here, and it can be nuanced, of course. You’re talking about people with families, emotions, backstories, etc. There’s no simple answer. For this specific post, though, we’re going to compare the idea of “coaching” with a PIP, or performance improvement plan.
Coaching has been shown to be beneficial across a number of contexts, from improving employee performance to helping adolescents move out of poverty. It can be very powerful if done properly, but this leads us to the central issue of coaching, that being…
Successful coaching is very time-consuming, generally. You need to regularly meet with an employee and go over:
It’s about building a relationship and using that as a factor in guiding how work is getting done. Many managers don’t feel they time for this, unfortunately; in one seminal study a few years ago, 60% of managers said they “didn’t have time” to respect their employees. If you don’t have time for respect, you likely don’t have time for coaching. And coaching isn’t a skill set that can be automated. Software suites exist to help with performance management, yes, but nothing is going to replace face-to-face communication and context anytime soon.
Pro Tip: Try this simple 4-step process for more effective coaching.
It creates a process — process is very important to many workplaces — for improving the employee on certain timelines, and if these markers and timelines are not met, there’s now a legally-justifiable way to terminate the employee’s contract.
First and perhaps most important, it makes the employee feel stigmatized and often depressed. Few are going to perform their best in that situation.
The second problem is that, by the time most managers put someone on a PIP, they tend to care less about the “I.” They don’t really want to improve the employee so much as get them out of the building, as Liz Ryan notes here:
They already know they want to get rid of you. I was an SVP of HR for eons and I know that when a manager comes into HR and says, “I need to put someone on probation” or “I need to put someone on a Performance Improvement Plan,” it means that the manager doesn’t like the employee and wants him or her out of the building.
It doesn’t mean the manager “doesn’t like” the employee every time, no, but usually a PIP is a drastic step meaning the manager has to interact with HR all the time (remember, managers are busy). If you’re at this point already, it might be too late.
First, you need a system for recognizing and contextualizing the different people who report to you — because they are all different. Try something like this simple chart from The Context Of Things:
Second: try an approach that’s more rooted in real conversation, so closer to a coaching model. How about the below?
Third: realize the psychological consequences for the employee of moving to a PIP. Try to work with them around the way they like to work before you get there. By the time you get there, it unfortunately may be too late.
An overarching idea, too: what if there’s no such thing as a bad employee? What if it’s just people in the wrong fits, i.e. wrong manager/wrong department/wrong organization? (In the latter case, it may be wise to help them exit.) Some people excel on one team and flounder on others; in the NBA, this happened with Victor Oladipo last season, as Malcolm Gladwell and Adam Grant mention on a podcast from April 2018.
The goal is employee development, but each employee is different — they need to be reached in different ways. But, typically speaking, conversation and context and coaching are the best steps early on.
Employee incentives and rewards don't lead to improved performance, they can actually have the opposite effect. Don't fall for this management myth.
Over the last decade, employee engagement has suffered in a big way. But improving employee engagement can give a big boost to your bottom line. So...
By positioning each employee to leverage their strengths, it becomes surprisingly easy to improve team performance. Here are 4 steps to do just that.