The McQuaig Blog

Are You Hiring the Best Interviewee… or the Best Employee?

Written by Teresa Romanovsky | Jul 29, 2026, 1:00:00 PM

A polished interview can be persuasive. A well-written resume can tell a compelling story. But neither is a reliable predictor of how someone will perform once they're in the role.

Most hiring managers have experienced it: the candidate who interviewed brilliantly but struggled to deliver, or the quieter candidate who exceeded every expectation after joining the team. The challenge isn't that interviews don't matter, it's that relying too heavily on first impressions, confidence, or instinct can make it difficult to see who is most likely to succeed over the long term.

Research continues to reinforce the point that unconscious bias naturally influences hiring decisions and becomes even more pronounced when interviews lack structure. Standardizing the interview process helps organizations make more objective, consistent decisions while reducing the influence of personal assumptions.

Start with the role, not the resume

Improving hiring accuracy begins long before candidates enter the interview room. It starts with a clear understanding of what success looks like in the role.

The McQuaig Job Survey helps hiring teams define the behavioral requirements of a position before recruitment begins. Rather than relying on assumptions or copying an old job description, hiring managers gain a shared understanding of the work environment, key responsibilities, and the behaviors most likely to support success.

This creates an objective benchmark that informs every stage of the hiring process. Instead of asking, Who impressed us most?, the conversation becomes, Who is most likely to succeed in this role?

Look beyond what candidates appear to do

Resumes and interviews each tell part of the story, but neither provides the complete picture. McQuaig's Three Levels of Assessment help hiring managers build a more balanced view by considering what a candidate Appears To do, Can Do, and Will Do.

  • Appears To reflects how candidates present themselves through their resume, interview, references, and previous experience. These insights are valuable, but they can also be influenced by confidence, preparation, or interview technique.
  • Can Do explores whether a candidate has the knowledge, skills, and experience to perform the role. This is typically assessed through qualifications, work history, technical assessments, and structured interview questions.
  • Will Do examines the behavioral patterns that influence how someone is likely to approach the role day to day. The McQuaig Word Survey provides insight into these natural tendencies, helping interviewers understand how candidates are likely to wor, not simply how effectively they interview.

Looking at all three levels together helps interviewers move beyond first impressions. A persuasive communicator is less likely to be selected on confidence alone, while a quieter candidate has an equal opportunity to demonstrate how their strengths align with the role.

Download the eBook: The Quick Guide to Effective Interviews

Reduce bias through structured interviews

Even experienced hiring managers can unintentionally ask different questions to different candidates or focus on information that confirms an initial impression. A structured interview process creates greater consistency while allowing genuine conversations to take place.

The McQuaig Job-Fit Interview Guide supports interviewers with targeted, behavior-based questions based on both the role requirements and the candidate's assessment results. Rather than relying on generic questions, interviewers are guided to explore real examples that validate strengths, uncover potential risks, and dig deeper into the claims made on an impressive resume.

This structured approach helps every candidate receive a more consistent interview experience while giving hiring teams richer, more comparable evidence on which to base decisions. A recent HR Magazine article supports the view that structured interviewing is one of the most effective ways to improve hiring quality by focusing conversations on job-relevant behaviors rather than interview performance alone.

Understand how someone will contribute to the team

Hiring success is about more than matching a person to a role. It also means understanding how they will work with their manager and colleagues.

McQuaig TeamSync extends the hiring process by helping organizations understand how a candidate's behavioral style complements an existing team. Before a hiring decision is made, managers can see where someone is likely to add strength, where differences may emerge, and how they can provide the right support to help the new hire succeed.

This moves conversations away from subjective ideas of ‘culture fit’ toward a more thoughtful discussion about collaboration, communication, and leadership. Rather than hiring people because they feel familiar, organizations can build teams with complementary strengths and a greater capacity to perform.

Better decisions come from better evidence

Evidence should inform hiring decisions, not replace professional judgment. There will always be occasions when a hiring manager chooses to take a chance on someone whose experience doesn't perfectly match the traditional profile or whose career path is unconventional.

The difference is that these decisions become informed choices rather than instinctive ones. By combining the McQuaig Job Survey, Word Survey, Job-Fit Interview Guide, and TeamSync, hiring managers understand where a candidate aligns with the role, where support may be needed, and what questions still need to be answered before making an offer.

Scientific validation is an important part of that confidence. As Jo Emmerson explored in Scientific Validation Matters in Psychometric Assessments, validated assessments provide reliable, research-backed insight that supports better hiring decisions. Rather than replacing human judgment, scientifically validated tools strengthen it by helping interviewers test assumptions, reduce bias, and make decisions based on evidence instead of gut feel.

This reflects broader trends across the HR profession. Employers are increasingly recognizing that long-term hiring success depends less on selecting who might appear to be the strongest interviewee and more on using structured, evidence-based methods to understand how someone is likely to perform once they're in the role.

Hiring will never be an exact science because people are complex. But when organizations combine role clarity, behavioral insight, structured interviewing, and sound professional judgment, they give themselves the best opportunity to improve hiring accuracy, elevate quality of hire, and make every hiring decision with greater confidence.

Read more: 5 Ways to Help Hiring Managers Move Beyond Gut Feel

Join the conversation.

Ready to take a more structured, evidence-based approach to hiring? Join Venessa Vasilakeris and Jo Emmerson for our webinar, Are You Hiring the Best Interviewee… or the Best Employee?, on Tuesday, August 25, 2026, at 2:00 p.m. BST / 10:00 a.m. ET.

We'll share practical strategies and proven tools that can help you improve hiring accuracy, elevate quality of hire, and make more confident people decisions. Register your place here.